ArticleCureus2025
A Giant Paraovarian Cyst Misdiagnosed as a Distended Bladder: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paraovarian cysts (PCs) are uncommon adnexal lesions that often present with nonspecific or absent symptoms, making clinical diagnosis challenging. When they exceed 150 mm in size, they are referred to as giant paraovarian cysts, a rare condition. This article presents the case of an asymptomatic 22-year-old woman with a large pelvic mass, incidentally discovered during physical examination by her family doctor. An abdominal ultrasound was requested, and the first diagnosis was a "severely distended bladder." The patient was referred to urology, where a neuroaxis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a urodynamic study were performed, both of which turned out to be normal. Due to the inconsistency of findings, the family doctor, who was closely following the case, requested an abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan, which revealed a large mass, possibly an "abdominopelvic ovarian cyst or borderline tumor." The patient was referred to gynecology and underwent pelvic MRI. At last, a final diagnosis was made: a giant paraovarian cyst. The cyst was drained via diagnostic and curative laparotomy, followed by a quick recovery of the patient. The histopathological analysis confirmed a serous cystadenoma. This case highlights the importance of a thorough physical examination and considering gynecologic etiologies in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses, even in asymptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.