Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904952›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Clustering of recurrent events data.

G Babykina, V Vandewalle, J Carretero-Bravo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G BabykinaULR 2694 - METRICS - Évaluation des Technologies de Santé et des Pratiques Médicales, CHU Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
V VandewalleUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, CNRS, Laboratoire J.A.Dieudonné, Maasai team, Nice, France.
J Carretero-BravoUniversity of Cádiz, Cadiz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays data are often timestamped, thus, when analysing the events which may occur several times (recurrent events), it is desirable to model the whole dynamics of the counting process rather than to focus on a total number of events. Such kind of data can be encountered in hospital readmissions, disease recurrences or repeated failures of industrial systems. Recurrent events can be analysed in the counting process framework, as in the Andersen-Gill model, assuming that the baseline intensity depends on time and on covariates, as in the Cox model. However, observed covariates are often insufficient to explain the observed heterogeneity in the data. We propose a mixture model for recurrent events, allowing to account for the unobserved heterogeneity and to perform clustering of individuals (unsupervised classification allowing to partition of the heterogeneous data according to unobserved, or latent, variables). Within each cluster, the recurrent event process intensity is specified parametrically and is adjusted for covariates. Model parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood using the EM algorithm; the BIC criterion is adopted to choose an optimal number of clusters. The model feasibility is checked on simulated data. Real data on hospital readmissions of elderly people, which motivated the development of the proposed clustering model, are analysed. The obtained results allow a fine understanding of the recurrent event process in each cluster.

Indexed as

Andersen–Gill modelapplication to medicineEM algorithmmodel-based clusteringRecurrent events data

Identifiers

PMID40904952
PMCPMC12404095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.