Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904943›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025

Code Status Discussions: A Standardized Patient Workshop for Senior Medical Students.

Hunter Bechtold, Reagan T Smith, Peter Wallenhorst, Kaylee Gouge, Sarah Schaefer, Kelsey Karnik, Kristen McQuerry, Kristen E Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hunter BechtoldResident, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Residency Program, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3147-6784
Reagan T SmithMedical Student, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
Peter WallenhorstAssistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine and Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Kaylee GougeResident, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Residency Program, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
Sarah SchaeferAssistant Professor, Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
Kelsey KarnikBiomedical Data Scientist, Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Heath.
Kristen McQuerryAssociate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Heath.
Kristen E FletcherAssociate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine and Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Residents frequently conduct code status discussions (CSDs) with patients, but many report not receiving formal training in this skill. While institutions have attempted to address this, there remains a need for a curriculum that uses standardized patients (SPs), is generalizable to students interested in different medical specialties, and has been tested on a large sample of students. Methods: We trained 192 fourth-year medical students across four different campuses in how to conduct CSDs during one 2-hour workshop as part of their Transition to Residency course in April 2024. Students worked with SPs as part of this workshop. Students at our main campus completed pre- and postworkshop paper surveys evaluating their confidence levels across five domains. Results: A total of 84 (69%) of the 121 students at the main campus completed both a pre- and postworkshop survey. There was a statistically significant change in confidence levels from pre- to postworkshop, with a higher proportion of students selecting increased confidence levels across all five questions on the postworkshop survey. Discussion: Our workshop increased the confidence of fourth-year medical students in conducting CSDs. This session successfully implemented simulations that used SPs for training a large group of fourth-year medical students bound for different medical specialties. This is the first workshop of its size and breadth, and it may serve as a standardized curriculum for other institutions wishing to formally train medical students to conduct CSDs.

Indexed as

Patient SimulationStudents, MedicalCurriculumEducationEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansInternship and ResidencySurveys and QuestionnairesCode Status DiscussionCommunication SkillsEnd of Life/Palliative CareStandardized PatientTransition to Residency

Identifiers

PMID40904943
PMCPMC12402213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.