ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Systematic review and evidence gap mapping of Alzheimer's disease biomarker studies in those with intellectual and developmental disability.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurodegenerative Biomarkers in Populations with Intellectual Disabilities: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Capacities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review and evidence gap mapping of Alzheimer's disease biomarker studies in those with intellectual and developmental disability.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are a relatively small number of investigations into brain aging in those with intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD). This project seeks to (1) characterize the internationally available multi-omics Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker studies including those with I/DD, and (2) discuss future research directions. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched under the following criteria: cross-sectional or longitudinal AD-omics studies on adults (18 +) with I/DD. 532 studies were identified, 186 studies were evaluated for full-text, 79 studies were excluded, and 117 studies were extracted. Most biological specimens were analyzed in blood, plasma, or serum. Metabolomics, hormonomics, and transcriptomics were most understudied. Sex differences were investigated in nine studies. Two studies included participants with non-Down syndrome neurodevelopmental disorders. European-based city populations were primarily represented across studies. Future studies including a broader range of I/DD presentations, and considering sex differences, comorbidities, and novel biomarkers beta synuclein are interesting future directions. Highlights: Small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs, and few prospective and retrospective studies highlight the need for more rigorous research design.A focus on European-based city populations and Down syndrome (DS) clinical groups prompts the need for inclusive, community-based recruitment methods across broader clinical and ethnic groups.The vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP2) shows promise for early detection of synaptic degeneration, potentially across I/DD groups, showing correlations with CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease, axonal injury, and cognitive performance in DS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.