ReviewDental research journal2025
Comparative evaluation of Papacarie and Carisolv in effective chemomechanical carious dentin removal in primary teeth: A systematic review.
Review in Dental research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to assess the techniques used in earlier conducted clinical investigations on the chemomechanical eradication of dentinal caries, as well as to assess the variances in pain perception, the time required for complete caries excavation, and how microbiological analysis compared before and following caries removal in primary teeth for both Papacarie and Carisolv. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted utilizing the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The following categories were included during the assessment process: full text randomized and controlled clinical trials published between January 2000 and December 2021 in the English language only. Adolescent and child patients with open dentinal carious lesion in primary teeth were included. The methodology of the seven clinical studies chosen was evaluated. Results: Findings of the study reported that the microbiota in carious dentine was dramatically reduced with the Papacarie therapy, and the pain perception decreased more in the Papacarie group, whereas Carisolv treatment took longer time for complete caries excavation as compared to Papacarie. Conclusion: In conclusion, Papacarie had a beneficial impact by decreasing pain and time taken during caries excavation in primary teeth. The tooth surface treated with Papacarie also demonstrated a reduced bacterial count as compared to Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal approach. Overall, Papacarie and Carisolv are viable minimally invasive and painless techniques for effective caries removal in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.