Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904879›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Phytomers, collet and founder cells: a "universal" plant embryonic body plan from a developmental, molecular, and evolutionary perspective.

Prakash Venglat, Perumal Vijayan, Timothy F Sharbel, Abidur Rahman, Karen Tanino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prakash VenglatCollege of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Perumal VijayanCollege of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Timothy F SharbelCollege of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Abidur RahmanCollege of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Karen TaninoCollege of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a novel perspective on plant embryogenesis, fundamentally differentiating it from the animal embryo model upon which plant models have long been based to discern the genetic and molecular mechanisms. We propose a plant embryonic body plan that aligns developmental and evolutionary insights across all five embryophyte groups (bryophytes, lycophytes, monilophytes, gymnosperms, and angiosperms). This conceptual model is grounded in a Reprogramming Potential (RP) involving an activation (RP1+) -suppression (RP1-) switch (RP1+/RP1-), which integrates embryonic development in a stepwise manner across diverse embryophytes. We further explore the evolutionary trajectory of this body plan, tracing the gradual assembly of the embryophyte genetic toolkit from bryophytes to angiosperms. Key developmental processes, such as the emergence of shoot and root meristems, vascular tissues, and seeds, are also examined within an evo-devo framework. Plant phenotypic plasticity, fundamental to their adaptation and survival, is manifested in two key hallmarks: (A) the iterative, modular growth of shoot and root units, and (B) their remarkable regenerative potential. While traditionally viewed as separate phenomena, we propose a novel, integrative model that connects these hallmarks within the context of plant embryogenesis. Our "proposed universal plant embryonic body plan" reconciles the genetic and molecular mechanisms of

Indexed as

developmentembryo - evolutionembryophytesGRNmodel

Identifiers

PMID40904879
PMCPMC12402943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.