ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025
A review of visual perception technology for intelligent fruit harvesting robots.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ground Mobile Robots for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review from the Closed-Loop Perspective of Perception, Decision, and Action.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- YOLO-FLBM: a lightweight and high-performance model for tomato ripeness detection in complex greenhouse environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Target-conditioned flow-matching policy for citrus harvesting robot pre-grasp approach behavior learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- An improved YOLOv11n-based method for high-precision detection of ginkgo fruits in complex natural environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of smart agriculture, fruit picking robots have attracted widespread attention as one of the key technologies to improve agricultural productivity. Visual perception technology plays a crucial role in fruit picking robots, involving precise fruit identification, localization, and grasping operations. This paper reviews the research progress in the visual perception technology for fruit picking robots, focusing on key technologies such as camera types used in picking robots, object detection techniques, picking point recognition and localization, active vision, and visual servoing. First, the paper introduces the application characteristics and selection criteria of different camera types in the fruit picking process. Then, it analyzes how object detection techniques help robots accurately recognize fruits and achieve efficient fruit classification. Next, it discusses the picking point recognition and localization technologies, including vision-based 3D reconstruction and depth sensing methods. Subsequently, it elaborates on the adaptability of active vision technology in dynamic environments and how visual servoing technology achieves precise localization. Additionally, the review explores robot mobility perception technologies, focusing on V-SLAM, mobile path planning, and task scheduling. These technologies enhance harvesting efficiency across the entire orchard and facilitate better collaboration among multiple robots. Finally, the paper summarizes the challenges in current research and the future development trends, aiming to provide references for the optimization and promotion of fruit picking robot technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.