Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904835›Full record

ArticleSage open pediatrics

Challenges in Pediatric Fluid Management: Insights into Nursing Practices and Knowledge.

Amir Shahzeydi, Faramarz Kalhor, Mahboobeh Namnabati, Fatemeh Joonbakhsh, Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee, Sajjad Khaksar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sage open pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amir ShahzeydiPediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Faramarz KalhorNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9436-0546
Mahboobeh NamnabatiNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh JoonbakhshNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali Mohammad SabzghabaeeIsfahan Clinical Toxicology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Sajjad KhaksarCritical care Department, Shariati Hospital, Social Security Organization, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fluid overload-a critical risk in pediatric/neonatal care-is often driven by excessive fluid during medication dilution, increasing complications like acute kidney injury(AKI), prolonged ventilation, and mortality. Methods: A 2024 cross-sectional study across 14 pediatric units (PICUs, NICUs, surgical/general wards) evaluated fluid administration practices and nurses' knowledge. Observations included 150 patients and 200 nurses administering 8 medications. Data on fluid volumes, infusion durations, compatibility, and storage compliance were collected via checklist and questionnaires. Results: Nurses demonstrated moderate overall knowledge (mean score: 68.3 ± 10.4), with unit-level variability. Performance scores were highest in PICUs (76.0 ± 9.7) and lowest in surgical wards (62.86 ± 12.7). Key issues included excessive dilution (vancomycin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone) and storage noncompliance (eg, 40% in cardiac NICUs), posing risks to vulnerable patients. Conclusion: Standardized dilution guidelines, enhanced education on drug compatibility/storage, and real-time monitoring tools are critical to mitigating fluid overload risks and improving pediatric outcomes.

Indexed as

childfluid overloadmedication administrationneonatenursenursing practicespediatric carepharmacological knowledge

Identifiers

PMID40904835
PMCPMC12402650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.