ArticleBritish paramedic journal2025
Exploratory study comparing a single episode of feedback with regular feedback and no feedback on BVM ventilation during a simulated cardiac arrest over a six-month time frame: a research protocol.
Article in British paramedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major cause of mortality in the UK, with survival rates remaining low despite advancements in resuscitation techniques. The European Resuscitation Council and Resuscitation Council UK guidelines recommend controlled ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), yet studies show that ambulance clinicians often fail to meet these standards. In particular, hyperventilation has been linked to worse outcomes. This protocol describes a study that will explore the impact of different applications of real-time ventilation feedback on the quality of ventilations during CPR in a simulated environment. Methods: This exploratory simulation study will assess the effectiveness of real-time feedback on the quality of ventilations delivered by ambulance clinicians. Participants from North East NHS Foundation Trust will be randomly assigned to three arms, receiving a single episode of feedback, regular feedback or no feedback (used as a control group). Each arm will complete four simulated OHCA scenarios over six months, and their ventilation quality will be assessed at each session. The primary outcome will be the quality of ventilations, measured by rate and tidal volume, at the six-month mark. Secondary outcomes include trends in ventilation quality over time and participant characteristics. Discussion: This study aims to explore whether regular feedback improves the quality of ventilations during CPR and whether feedback sessions influence skill retention over a six-month period. Findings could inform training strategies, highlighting the role of real-time feedback in maintaining high-quality CPR skills. With a lack of prior research on ventilation skill maintenance in the UK, this study is expected to provide valuable insights into optimising clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.