Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904746›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports

Cost-benefit of dementia insurance for cognitively-unimpaired

Kenichiro Sato, Saki Nakashima, Yoshiki Niimi, Ryoko Ihara, Takeshi Iwatsubo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenichiro SatoDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4351-9526
Saki NakashimaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiki NiimiUnit for Early and Exploratory Clinical Development, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryoko IharaDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi IwatsuboDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dementia insurance, a private insurance product covering the first diagnosis of dementia of the insured, may be beneficial for asymptomatic individuals who recognize their own high genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Objective: We aimed to examine the cost-benefit of dementia insurance in cognitively unimpaired individuals, stratified by Methods: A simulation study using 18 years of longitudinal data from National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center study to simulate the income and expenses of dementia insurance from the insured's perspective. Cognitively unimpaired participants at baseline (approximately n = 9000) were included, and the loss ratio (= total benefits gained / total premium paid) was calculated by Results: For individuals aged 60 or older with ≥ 10-year follow-up, the estimated loss ratio was highest in Conclusions: Dementia insurance may be relatively more cost-beneficial for asymptomatic ε4-homozygotes in their 60 s or older compared to other genotypes over policy periods of 10 years or longer. However, it does not represent a clear financial gain for the insured, highlighting the need for careful consideration. Our study provides an important basis for further investigating the advantages and limitations of dementia insurance for individuals with high-risk gene.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseAPOEcost-benefitdementia insurancegenetic riskε4-homozygote

Identifiers

PMID40904746
PMCPMC12402658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.