Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904745›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism2025

Bone health in cancer: perspective on the use of osteoanabolic agents.

Tariq Chukir, Hanna Taipaleenmäeki, Melody Cheung, Azeez Farooki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical and geriatric factors associated with fracture risk in older adults with bone metastases: A prospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  2. Review
  3. Leave no bone unturned: metabolic bone disease in special populations.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tariq ChukirMedical Education Department, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9277-4171
Hanna TaipaleenmäekiInstitute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Melody CheungMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Azeez FarookiEndocrinology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 E 74th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer negatively impacts bone health through various mechanisms, including treatment-induced bone loss and malignant bone lesions, often leading to increased fracture risk and higher morbidity and mortality. Antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates and denosumab) are the current standard of care to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events and prevent treatment-related fragility fractures in patients with cancer. While there is strong evidence to support their benefits in cancer, there is potential room for further reduction in the risk of pathologic and fragility fractures. This narrative review explores the potential role and theoretical concerns regarding the use of osteoanabolic agents in cancer. We also discuss management challenges, such as recurrent pathologic fractures, fragility fractures, and osteonecrosis of the jaw that may arise in clinical practice, prompting consideration of the use of osteoanabolic agents in patients with a history of cancer. Preclinical studies have shown conflicting outcomes regarding the effects on cancer with parathyroid hormone treatment, but promising results with the use of anti-sclerostin antibody in cancer models. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from available preclinical and clinical data. Theoretical risks exist for both cancer survivors and patients with advanced cancer in the bone. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio should be carefully considered when evaluating the use of an osteoanabolic agent in the cancer context.

Indexed as

anabolic agentsbone healthbone metastasescancerskeletal-related events

Identifiers

PMID40904745
PMCPMC12402605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.