ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
An Analysis of Mental Health, Subjective Well-Being, and Self-Efficacy Among Nurses in the Qassim Health Cluster: Identification of Risk Levels.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonverbal AI-Based Communication Robot for Staff in Disaster-Affected Care Facilities: Exploratory ABAB Intervention Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Investigating the mediating role of learning engagement in the relationship between self-efficacy for managing emotional challenges and subjective well-being among medical students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses are the cornerstone of the healthcare system, playing a vital role in delivering consistent, high-quality patient care. However, working in high-stress environments such as hospitals and health clusters exposes them to ongoing well-being, emotional, and psychological challenges. If unaddressed, these factors can significantly compromise their mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy, ultimately affecting workforce sustainability and patient outcomes. Aim: To assess the mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy of the nursing workforce within the Qassim Health Cluster and identify individuals or groups at elevated risk. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 306 nursing staff, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a standardized electronic survey administered between January to March 2025 across three hospitals in Buraydah city. The survey included the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) to assess mental health, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to measure subjective well-being, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to evaluate perceived self-efficacy. Results: The majority of participants were female, middle-aged, and holding a bachelor's degree and varying levels of work experience. Overall, nurses demonstrated moderate to high levels of mental health (65.26%), self-efficacy (58.64%), and subjective well-being (69.95%). Mean scores were 45.68 (±17.26) for mental health (MHC-SF), 30.98 (±5.70) for self-efficacy (GSE), and 14.66 (±6.17) for well-being (WHO-5). Significant positive correlations were observed among all variables: mental health was strongly correlated with self-efficacy ( Conclusion: Nurses' mental health, self-efficacy, and well-being are interrelated and critically impact the quality of patient care. Healthcare organizations should implement targeted interventions, particularly training and stress management programs to support the psychological and subjective health of nurses, with a focus on less experienced staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.