ReviewDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
High Natural Background Radiation Areas: A Literature Review that Reveals Systematic Adaptive Response but Controversial Data With Single Dose.
Review in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Perception of Natural Background Radiation and Its Implications for Public Health Communication.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The impact of long-term low-dose ionizing radiation on human health: risks and protective measures.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Understanding the Radiation Adaptive Response: General Methodology and Theoretical Approaches to the Study of the Radioadaptation Phenomenon.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The natural radiation background contributes to the dose of ionizing radiation received by the whole population. However, the telluric component of the natural background radiation is not homogenous on Earth: while the average effective dose has been estimated to be 2.4 mSv/year worldwide, certain regions are considered as high natural background radiation areas (HBRA). To investigate the specificities of a continuous exposure to low-dose-rate irradiation, we reviewed data of the major HBRA from 98 studies published between 1973 and 2023. Three conclusions were drawn: 1) the dose received by the HBRA inhabitants is much lower than values assessed on hot spots : at Ramsar (Iran), 260 mSv/year were assessed at the highest hotspots but the maximal estimated dose-rate received by inhabitants is 80 mSv/year; 2) when DNA or chromosome breaks, cancer or accelerated aging are used as endpoints, no significant difference was observed between cells from HBRA and non-HBRA inhabitants; 3) conversely, adaptive response effect was systematically observed on ex vivo lymphocytes from HBRA inhabitants when they are exposed to a high dose ranging for 0.25 to 4 Gy. A mechanistic model based on the radiation-induced nucleoshuttling of the ATM protein provides an explanation to these last two conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.