Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904623›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

From Recruitment to Retirement: Research Infrastructure Staff Views on the Diversification of Scientific Career Paths at Universities in Sweden in 2024.

Kristen Schroeder, Julia Fernández-Rodríguez, Annika Jenmalm-Jensen, Josefin Lundgren-Gawell, Sara Sandin, Charlotte Stadler, Jessica M Lindvall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristen SchroederScience for Life Laboratory, Training Hub, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-4530
Julia Fernández-RodríguezScience for Life Laboratory, Centre for Cellular Imaging, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Annika Jenmalm-JensenScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Science for Life Laboratory, Huddinge, Sweden.
Josefin Lundgren-GawellScience for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Insitute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara SandinScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Umeå Centre for Electron Microscopy, Umeå University, Umeå, Umea, Sweden.
Charlotte StadlerScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Sciences, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology; Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6781-1938
Jessica M LindvallScience for Life Laboratory, Training Hub, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-8481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is an ongoing need to develop diverse career paths that support the vital contributions of staff scientists, research engineers, scientific officers, and other knowledge professionals in scientific discovery. Research infrastructures and core facilities have a particular need to support sustainable and diverse careers, as they either employ - if being a legal entity - or daily manage research professionals in a broad variety of roles to enable resources, services, and innovation. Methods: In 2019, a survey of the facility staff at SciLifeLab, a large national research infrastructure in Sweden, led to a recommendation for universities to develop career paths for their staff scientists. Five years later, we have conducted a survey and workshop to determine current views of infrastructure staff on career path diversity in Sweden. Results: Our results indicate there is a strong need for clarity and communication about planning and implementation of career path structures at Swedish universities, as well as opportunities to foster excellence in infrastructure staff. While the workshop participants ranked Sweden as a stable and attractive place to work and reported continuous development of their technical and service skills, the lack of recognition of this expertise presents a barrier to a sustainable career. Conclusions: We conclude that there is a need to continue advocating for increased clarity and diversity in career paths for staff scientists in Sweden, and raise the views presented by infrastructure staff on the challenges and opportunities unique to their roles.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceCareer MobilityResearch PersonnelRetirementHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenUniversitiescareer pathslife scienceresearch infrastructurescience and societySweden

Identifiers

PMID40904623
PMCPMC12402762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.