Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904614›Full record

ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2025

Development of a methodology for the volume estimation of the prefrontal cortical subfields in very pre-term infants using magnetic resonance imaging and stereology.

Faten Aldhafeeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Faten AldhafeeriDepartment of Health Information Management and Technology, University of Hafr Al-Batin College of Applied Medical Sciences, Hafar Al Batin 39953, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is vital for cognitive and emotional functions and is vulnerable to disruptions in preterm infants. Reliable volume estimation methods are needed to study its development. Objective: To develop and validate a novel method for estimating the volume of PFC subfields in very preterm infants using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with stereological techniques. The method was designed to achieve a coefficient of error (CE) below 5%. Methods: Five preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation were scanned using a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. The points of intersection between the grid and structure boundaries, in addition to the points in each slice, were counted using in-house software (Easy Measure). Results: The shape coefficient for each subfield of the prefrontal cortex was calculated, which yielded coefficients of 4.5, 6.1, 6.4, and 6.5 for dorsolateral, dorsomedial, orbitolateral, and orbitomedial PFC regions, respectively. For the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a grid size of 4 × 4 pixels and a 0.2 cm slice gap for the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), a grid size of 5 × 5 pixels and a 0.1 cm slice gap for the orbitolateral PFC, a grid size of 5 × 5 pixels and a 0.3 cm slice gap, and a grid size of 5 × 5 pixels and 0.1 cm slice gap for the DMPFC resulted in <5% CE. Conclusion: This methodology offers new insights into the neurodevelopmental effects of preterm birth and has potential applications in the early detection of neurodevelopmental disorders. Its precision, reliability, and non-invasive nature make it suitable for longitudinal studies and contribute to neonatal neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental research.

Indexed as

grey mattermagnetic resonance imagingPFCstereologyvolume estimation

Identifiers

PMID40904614
PMCPMC12404656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.