ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2025
Entanglement between pharmacy/pharmaceutical education and cancer? A bibliometric answer.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing role of pharmacists in cancer care highlights the need to understand research trends linking pharmaceutical education and oncology. Objective: To quantitatively investigate the bibliometric status of the entanglement between pharmacy/pharmaceutical education and cancer-related issues, providing feasible information and suggestions for the developmental basis and research hotspots. Methods: Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection. Boolean operations (BO) were used to set up the literature query set. The literature published between 1985 and 2022 was screened for the types of "article" and "review." The citation analysis and research hotspot extraction were performed using the "analyze results" and "citation report" functions of Clarivate Analytics. Results: The bibliometric analysis of 722 relevant papers showed that the global interest in the topic is increasing and the collaboration between countries is quite active. The extraction results showed that guidelines for cancer therapy, palliative care and pain management, pharmacy staff's attitudes and knowledge, and adherence to chemotherapy were the main research hotspots and that these have been long-term discussed. Conclusion: Conducting a bibliometric study to analyze the overall publication status, developmental basis, and research hotspots will reveal the logical entanglement of the existing academic research between pharmacy/pharmaceutical education and cancer, and will provide a reference for academic development in the educational and oncological community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.