ArticleBrain communications2025
Activation metrics for structural connectivity recruitment in deep brain stimulation.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Deep Brain Stimulation Locations for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of deep brain stimulation on dysphagia in Parkinson's disease: mechanisms, evidence, and outlook.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Evaluation of DBS computational modeling methodologies using in-vivo electrophysiology in Parkinson's disease.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparatively high excitability of myelinated fibres suggests that they represent a major mediator of deep brain stimulation effects. Such effects can be modelled using different levels of abstraction, ranging from simple electric field estimates to complex multicompartment axon models. In this study, we explored three metrics to evaluate axonal activation: electric field magnitudes, electric field projections and pathway activation modelling. Furthermore, in order to account for variability in axonal morphology, these metrics were computed in a probabilistic fashion. To showcase and illustrate their relevance, we retrospectively analysed a dataset of 15 Parkinson's disease patients, who were stimulated in the subthalamic nucleus in bipolar mode. High similarity of activation patterns was observed for the electric field metrics, but not for pathway activation modelling, which might be attributed to its ability to capture stimulation's polarity. Nevertheless, all three metrics associated motor improvement with activation of motor pallidosubthalamic and hyperdirect pathways. To make these probabilistic approaches accessible to the community, the modelling and statistical framework was implemented in the openly available Lead-DBS toolbox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.