ArticleBJUI compass2025
Hydrodissection using 10% dextrose before focal therapy of prostate cancer: Initial experience.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrodissection using 10% dextrose before focal therapy of prostate cancer: Initial experience.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space using 10% dextrose for focal therapy of posterior prostate tumours. Patients and methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent focal therapy for a posterior prostate tumour with a prior injection of 10% dextrose in the prostato-rectal space, between October 2024 and February 2025. The main outcomes were to evaluate the space created using this technique. As the technique used for hydrodissection was modelled on periprostatic nerve block, we analysed a cohort of patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsies with periprostatic nerve block using 20 ml of lidocaine, to compare the prostato-rectal spaces created by 10% dextrose and by lidocaine. Results: A total of 11 patients underwent a focal therapy with a prior 20 ml 10% dextrose hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space. Fifteen patients who underwent prostatic biopsies using a periprostatic nerve block (20 ml of lidocaine), with similar characteristics, were included. The median prostato-rectal space created with dextrose and with lidocaine was 8.9 [8.0; 9.9] and 6.7 [6.4; 8.4] mm, respectively (p = 0,17). The prostato-rectal space decreased slower with dextrose: 0.03 mm/min vs 0.1 mm/min (p = 0,02). The prostato-rectal space was higher at the end of focal therapy procedures (7.9 vs 6.6 mm, p = 0,033), despite a longer procedure time in focal therapy (37 vs 8 min, p < 0,001). At the end of focal therapy procedures, all patients had a prostato-rectal space > 5 mm. No hydrodissection-related adverse event was observed. Conclusions: These initial results suggest that hydrodissection of the prostate-rectal space using 20 ml 10% dextrose, injected following a standard periprostatic nerve block protocol, is feasible, reproducible and safe for a focal therapy procedure for localized posterior prostate tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.