ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
A new deep learning model for predicting IMRT dose distributions for lung cancer with dose masks.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: 3D U-Net deep neural networks are widely used for predicting radiotherapy dose distributions. However, dose prediction for lung cancer IMRT is limited to conventional radiotherapy, with significant errors in predicting the intermediate and low-dose regions. Methods: We included a mixed dataset of conventional radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy with various prescription schemes. In addition to inputting CT images and anatomical structures, we incorporated dose mask information to provide richer local low-dose details. We trained five models with varying numbers of dose masks to investigate their impact on dose prediction models. Results: The inclusion of dose masks led to significant improvements in prediction accuracy for both the PTV and OARs. In particular, the mean absolute error (MAE) of dosimetric metrics for most OARs fell below 2%, and voxel-wise MAE within each structure steadily decreased as more dose masks were supplied-most notably in low-dose regions. These results demonstrate that incorporating dose masks effectively enhances training efficiency and prediction stability. Among models receiving varying numbers of dose masks, the configuration with ten masks achieved the highest predictive accuracy. Conclusion: This study proposes a dose mask-assisted method for lung cancer IMRT dose prediction. It demonstrates high accuracy and robustness in clinical radiotherapy scenarios with various prescription schemes, including conventional radiotherapy and SIB. The inclusion of additional dose masks significantly improved model performance, with prediction accuracy increasing as the number of masks increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.