ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-world Australian experience with tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-importance of pre-CAR-T optimization.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes and spatial transcriptomic profiles of CD19/20 CAR-T therapy in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Current evidence and strategies for bridging therapy in CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Up to 50% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse or are refractory to first-line therapy. Tisagenlecleucel, a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, is approved for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL in the third-line setting. Patients with r/r DLBCL treated with tisagenlecleucel in the real world have shown similar outcomes to those in clinical trials. Methods: We report a single-center real-world analysis of patients with r/r DLBCL treated with tisagenlecleucel. Results: As of December 31, 2024, 63 patients with r/r DLBCL had received tisagenlecleucel (median follow-up, 15 months). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 89%; 95% were grades 1/2. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in 17% (10/11 cases mild; one case grade ≥3). The overall response rate was 79%, with 60% complete response (CR). The median duration of response was 26.4 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.6 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 15.4 months. Patients whose response at day 30 was CR had a 42% reduction in risk of progression compared with those who achieved partial response (PR). High lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at infusion was associated with a higher risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1) and death (HR 2.65) than normal LDH, with the risk for progression increased 3.3-fold in a multivariate model. Almost one-third of our patients who achieved CR/PR had normalized their LDH at the time of infusion from a previously elevated level, of whom 87% (13/15) had received bridging therapy. Lack of response to bridging was associated with an almost twofold increased risk of progression compared with the responsive patients (3.1 vs. 19.5 months; HR 1.9; 95% CI: 0.9-3.9, Conclusion: We demonstrated in this analysis that the safety and efficacy of tisagenlecleucel in patients with r/r DLBCL in an Australian real-world setting were better than in the pivotal JULIET clinical trial and other registry studies. We also confirmed the importance of achieving early CR and normalizing the LDH levels at CAR-T cell infusion to reduce the risk of disease progression. Our results suggest that bridging therapy played an important role in optimizing outcomes by managing pre-CAR-T disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.