ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in older adults with renal cell carcinoma: findings from a multicenter observational study in Poland.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo+ipi) are recommended for treating metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), though their safety and efficacy in older adults remain uncertain. This study examines the outcomes of this regimen in Polish patients aged ≥65 years. Methods: In this multicenter observational study, 138 patients with mRCC who received nivo+ipi between May 2022 and October 2024 were analyzed. Key outcomes included objective response rates (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) with comparisons between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years. Safety was assessed based on the incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied. Results: After a median follow-up of 13 months, the median PFS for the entire cohort was 15.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.2-20.8); in patients <65 years, it was 11.3 months, while in those ≥65 years, it was 23 months. Patients ≥65 years had a 40% lower risk of progression than younger patients (hazard ratio 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, p=0.03). Patients aged ≥65 years exhibited a higher ORR (46.2% vs. 26%) and DCR (73.8% vs. 63%, p=0.02 for both). The overall incidence of irAEs was comparable between age groups; however, older patients experienced a higher frequency of very severe irAEs (1 vs. 6, p=0.06). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that nivo+ipi are effective across age groups, with older patients achieving comparable or even superior outcomes with acceptable irAEs rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.