Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904488›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Ingroup preferences, segregation, and intergroup contact in neighborhoods and civic organizations.

Kasimir Dederichs, Rob Franken, Dingeman Wiertz, Jochem Tolsma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kasimir DederichsNuffield College, University of Oxford, New Road, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-0504
Rob FrankenDepartment of Sociology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-617X
Dingeman WiertzUCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 55-59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-6081
Jochem TolsmaDepartment of Sociology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Thomas van Aquinostraat 4, 6525 GD Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4411-6932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregation perpetuates social inequalities and undermines social cohesion. It can already emerge if individuals act upon weak preferences to associate with similar others. Yet, little remains known about how such ingroup preferences compare across social settings and different identity dimensions. To address this gap and to isolate ingroup preferences from other drivers of segregation, three large-scale, preregistered conjoint experiments on choices of neighborhoods and civic organizations were conducted (

Indexed as

civic organizationsconjoint experimentsingroup preferencesneighborhoodssegregation

Identifiers

PMID40904488
PMCPMC12403059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.