ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Evaluation of pediatric sleep screening practices in primary care in a northeastern region of France: A survey conducted among general practitioners.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric sleep disorders are underreported and underdiagnosed in primary care settings. This study aimed to compare the screening and management of sleep in young children during routine follow-up consultations by general practitioners (GPs) and physicians from Maternal and Child Protection services (MCPPs) in a region of France. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a questionnaire with 20 closed questions designed to characterize knowledge and practices and to evaluate the perceived need for additional training in pediatric sleep. The survey was administered to 343 GPs and 28 MCPPs. Results: A total of 211 (62%) GPs and 17 (61%) MCPPs participated in the survey. The respondents indicated a strong focus on sleep, GPs reporting significantly lower scores compared to MCPPs (4 [3, 4] vs 4 [4, 5], Discussion: GPs demonstrated lower awareness and training in young children's sleep issues compared to MCPPs. These findings emphasize the need for improved training and awareness, highlighting the importance of evaluating children's sleep issues during pediatric consultations by GPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.