ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Association between polypharmacy and the risk of requiring long-term care among community-dwelling older residents: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Care-Related Determinants of First-Time Long-Term Care Need in Older Adults in Germany: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Claims Data.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Association between polypharmacy and the risk of requiring long-term care among community-dwelling older residents: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polypharmacy has been increasing attention as it is associated with a number of health problems, especially adverse outcomes in older adults. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the risk of polypharmacy and long-term care. Methods: We analyzed a community-based retrospective cohort of residents of Goto City by combining data from health checkups, prescription information, and long-term care needs certification database. The study sample included residents aged 65-79 years in 2015 who were followed up for 4 years. The number of medications used was categorized as 0, 1-5, 6-9, and ≥10. The outcome was initiation of long-term care. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Among 1083 participants, 58 used long-term care for 4 years. Compared with participants taking no medication, the incidence of long-term care initiation was approximately double in those taking 1-5 medications, four times higher in people taking 6-9 medications, and 13 times higher in people taking ≥10 medications. After adjusting for potential baseline confounders, the number of medications was significantly associated with the initiation of long-term care services (1-5 drugs: adjusted HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.06-5.34; 6-9 drugs: adjusted HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.23-7.15; and ≥10 drugs: adjusted HR 5.54, 95% CI 1.89-16.23). Conclusions: Among community-dwelling residents aged 65-79 years, the risk of requiring long-term care had a dose-response relationship with the number of prescribed medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.