ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Outcomes associated with use of makyokansekito, a Japanese herbal kampo medicine, in outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes associated with use of makyokansekito, a Japanese herbal kampo medicine, in outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although selected patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can be treated in outpatient settings, some exhibit an insufficient response to initial outpatient treatment resulting in subsequent hospitalizations. Laboratory and animal studies have demonstrated that makyokansekito, a Japanese herbal kampo medicine, can alleviate lung damage and inflammation. However, its clinical effectiveness in adult patients with CAP has not been evaluated. Methods: Using the commercially available JMDC health insurance claims database (Tokyo, Japan), we identified outpatients with CAP between April 2012 and April 2022. Patients were classified into those who received or did not receive makyokansekito on the day of diagnosis. The primary outcome was hospitalization within 30 days. The secondary outcomes included antibiotic treatment duration and total medical costs. Multivariate regression analyses were used to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Results: Among 76,177 eligible patients, 273 and 75,904 were classified into the makyokansekito and non-makyokansekito groups, respectively. After adjustment, the proportions of hospitalized patients in the makyokansekito and non-makyokansekito groups were 3.0 and 3.4%, respectively, with a difference of -0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.5% to 1.8%; Conclusion: The use of makyokansekito in outpatients with CAP was not associated with a reduction in hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.