Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

No differences in executive functions between female and male young talented football players.

Jennifer Lehmann, Stefanie Pietsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer LehmannFaculty of Human Science, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stefanie PietschFaculty of Human Science, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research regarding the relationship between cognitive performance and sport performance in young talented football players has mainly been investigated in male athletes. Only few studies have addressed these aspects in female athletes. Thus, this quasi-experimental cross-sectional study aims to contribute to research addressing possible sex differences in the relationship of cognitive aspects in young talented football players during a selection assessment for a representative team and possible adjustments in this process or training processes in consideration of potential sex differences. Methods: Therefore, the participants were assessed using a general questionnaire, the Number Connection Test (ZVT), and a resilience questionnaire (1st session), as well as the 2-back test, the Flanker test, and the Switching task (computer-based, 2nd session). In total 59 male and 47 female athletes aged between 12 and 13 years were included. Results: The results of this study did not show any differences in executive function performance between female and male talented football players. Additionally, when examining potential differences between players selected for a representative team and those, who were not, no such differences were detected. Neither in general, nor sex-specific. Discussion: The results suggest that further research is necessary to clarify whether there are sex differences among talented young football players and whether these differences play a role in the selection for a representative team.

Indexed as

developmentexecutive functionsfootballsex differencesyoung

Identifiers

PMID40904398
PMCPMC12402936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.