Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904372›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Structure of Bee Communities in Marginal Lands of the Puget Sound, USA.

Evan Sugden, Will Peterman, Robert Redmond, Riley M Anderson, David W Crowder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evan SugdenEntomo-Logic Salt Lake City Utah USA.
Will PetermanBee Search Seattle Washington USA.
Robert RedmondThe Common Acre Seattle Washington USA.
Riley M AndersonDepartment of Entomology Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.
David W CrowderDepartment of Entomology Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3720-1581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild bee communities in urban ecosystems are often challenged by habitat fragmentation and low floral diversity. In such settings, marginal land surrounding airports or in power line corridors may support bees, even with small habitat patches. However, temporal surveys of wild bees are lacking for many urban areas such as the Puget Sound region of western Washington State, USA. Here, we conducted wild bee surveys at three peri-urban sites in the Puget Sound over 7 years. Specifically, a standardized protocol was used to sample wild bee communities monthly from April to October at two sites associated with airports and one site in a power line corridor. In total, our surveys collected 25,441 specimens representing 118 confirmed species within 24 genera, with individual subsites having between 15 and 35 species in any year. The Halictidae represented the largest number of individuals collected, with 47% of specimens. By genus,

Indexed as

airportconservationnative beepollinatorspower line corridorurban ecosystems

Identifiers

PMID40904372
PMCPMC12404176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.