ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
An in-depth analysis of research on posthepatectomy liver failure (2006-2024): exploring trends and future directions through a bibliometric approach.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify global hotspots and future trends within the research on posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Design: Bibliometric analysis through science mapping and performance analysis. Data sources: The Web of Science Core Collection. Data extraction and synthesis: The Web of Science Core Collection database was searched for literature related to PHLF from 2006 to 2024. The authors, publishing institutions, countries, cited literature, journals, and keywords of the included studies were utilized for bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Results: The analysis included 986 publications authored by 296 researchers from 60 countries and 246 institutions across 292 journals. The most prolific authors were Aldrighetti Luca, Cescon Matteo and Sparrelid Ernesto. The institutions with the most publications were Naval Medical University, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, and the University of Amsterdam. The countries with the largest number of publications were China, Japan, and the United States. The most commonly cited literature was "posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading" by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Annals of Surgery ranked first in the number of co-citations among journals. Currently, the research hotspots of PHLF focus primarily on novel surgical procedures such as liver venous deprivation, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and the prediction of PHLF. Conclusion: Our study elucidates the global research status of PHLF and clarifies the relevant research hotspots and trends, providing clinicians and researchers with a better understanding of the state of the art and directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.