Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904352›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2025

Accuracy of Intraoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation by Imprint Cytology in Breast Cancer: A 12-Year Single Center Experience With 2,528 Patients.

Aysel Bayram, Sidar Bagbudar, Cagla Safak Karaoglan, Esma Sayar, Baran Mollavelioglu, Mustafa Tukenmez, Hasan Karanlık, Semen Onder, Ekrem Yavuz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aysel BayramDepartment of Pathology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5014-0074
Sidar BagbudarDepartment of Pathology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-9394
Cagla Safak KaraoglanDepartment of Pathology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3582-2982
Esma SayarDepartment of Pathology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Baran MollaveliogluDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-044X
Mustafa TukenmezDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-568X
Hasan KaranlıkDepartment of Surgical Oncology Unit, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6156-7260
Semen OnderDepartment of Pathology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-630X
Ekrem YavuzDepartment of Pathology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-0648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a key procedure for evaluating axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer, offering lower morbidity than axillary lymph node dissection. Intraoperative evaluation (IOE) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) with methods like frozen section (FS) and imprint cytology (IC) aid in making immediate surgical decisions, although IOE accuracy may vary due to several factors. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved 2,528 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SLNB at a single institution from 2012 to 2024. Primarily, IC was used for intraoperative assessment, while FS was selectively performed in certain cases, such as with suspicious macroscopic findings or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The final diagnosis relied on permanent sections with serial step-leveling and classification of metastasis size. Results: IOE showed a sensitivity of 65.8% and specificity of 97% for detecting lymph node metastases. The combination of IC and FS yielded higher sensitivity (76.1%) compared to IC alone (64.1%), particularly for isolated tumor cells (ITC). Patients treated with NAC exhibited slightly lower IOE accuracy (83.8%) compared to those without NAC (85.9%). False negatives were more common in cases of micrometastasis, ITC, and invasive lobular subtype. Excluding micrometastasis and ITC significantly enhanced IOE accuracy. Conclusion: The accuracy of intraoperative SLN evaluation is affected by size of the metastasis, tumor subtype, and prior NAC. While IC is acceptable for IOE, combining IC and FS is advised, especially in the setting of earlier NAC, to enhance accuracy for small metastatic foci.

Indexed as

Breast cancerintraoperative evaluationneoadjuvant chemotherapysentinel lymph nodes

Identifiers

PMID40904352
PMCPMC12462718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.