Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904331›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025

Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Helical Tomotherapy in Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Marziyeh Mirzaeiyan, Ali Akhavan, Alireza Amouheidari, Atoosa Adibi, Simin Hemati, Mahnaz Etehadtavakol, Hossein Khanahmad, Parvaneh Shokrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marziyeh MirzaeiyanDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali AkhavanDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza AmouheidariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Isfahan Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Atoosa AdibiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Simin HematiDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mahnaz EtehadtavakolDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hossein KhanahmadDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Parvaneh ShokraniDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Modern radiotherapy techniques can destroy tumors with less harm to surrounding normal tissues. Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models are useful to evaluate treatment plans. Objective: This study aimed to use the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) program to evaluate dose-volume indicators and radiobiological parameters for complications of the rectum and bladder in prostate cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy. Material and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, treatment planning information was gathered from 35 patients with pelvic lymph node involvement. Of these, 17 and 18 were treated using the three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Technique (3D-CRT) and the Helical Tomotherapy (HT) technique, respectively. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman and Relative Seriality models were used in conjunction with dose-volume histograms to calculate the NTCP values for the rectum and bladder. Results: In the HT group compared to the 3D-CRT group, the values of D-Mean, V-40, V-50, V-60, and V-65 were lower for both the rectum and bladder. The NTCP values for grade 2 rectal bleeding, proctitis, and bladder toxicity were lower in the HT group. The dose-volume data of 67% of the HT patients satisfied all QUANTEC criteria, while only 30% of the 3D-CRT those met criteria. Conclusion: The QUANTEC criteria were satisfied for the rectum and bladder in the HT and 3D-CRT groups, except for V-50, V-60, and V-65 of the rectum in 3D-CRT patients. The NTCP values for both organs were lower in the HT group than in the 3D-CRT group.

Indexed as

ProstateRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRectum

Identifiers

PMID40904331
PMCPMC12402409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.