ReviewJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management of Chronic Pain.
Review in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome : Long-Term Outcomes and Satisfaction after Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection for CTS.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Multimodal Neuroimaging and Electrophysiological Markers in Multiple Sclerosis: An Integrative Review of fMRI, EEG, and EMG Approaches : fMRI, EEG, EMG in Multiple Sclerosis.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Temporary Anchorage Devices in Combined Treatments: Bridging Orthodontics and Prosthetics : Temporary Anchorage Devices in Combined Treatments.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain is a prevalent condition and the leading cause of work absenteeism worldwide. This condition involves persistent pain lasting more than three months, significantly impacting the quality of life and social interactions of patients. While the causes of chronic pain can often remain unknown, no definitive cure exists for the various known causes. Furthermore, the evaluation and prediction of pain can be challenging, particularly in unconscious patients receiving care in the intensive care unit. Subjective measures and traditional methods are typically employed for diagnosis, assessment, and treatment to identify the most effective approach. However, recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other computer science fields have revolutionized the medical domain, offering a novel and promising avenue for enhancing pain management. This review provides an overview of the potential benefits, limitations, and prospects associated with the role of AI in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.