ArticleBJPsych open2025
The meaning of 'acceptance' of a psychiatric diagnosis: qualitative study of illness narratives with review of the literature.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trying to Survive in an Emotional Storm: A Qualitative Framework Analysis of Anonymous Youth Helpline Conversations on Mental Health and Everyday Life.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- The DSM needs more than revision: five blind spots and a case for dialogical redesign.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough diagnosis acceptance is frequently discussed in psychiatric practice and research, both components - psychiatric diagnoses and the act of accepting them - are inherently unclear.
aimsThe present study aimed to evaluate how well existing theoretical concepts of diagnosis acceptance align with patient experiences and to explore themes related to diagnosis acceptance.
methodAn iterative thematic analysis was conducted on 30 illness narratives from (former) psychiatric patients. The analysis proceeded through three phases: (a) review of transcripts for overall narratives and attitudes toward diagnoses, (b) extraction of detailed data using a narrative summary template and (c) refining and comparison of themes across narratives.
resultsExisting acceptance theories insufficiently captured the lived experiences reflected in the narratives. Attitudes toward diagnoses were multidimensional, fluctuated over time and were often described using terms other than 'acceptance'. Participants emphasised the importance of sharing their stories without being defined by a diagnosis and conflated DSM-5 classifications with broader diagnostic terms, highlighting challenges in communication of psychiatric constructs. Disagreement with diagnoses did not necessarily hinder therapeutic relationships, emphasising the importance of collaboration over consensus.
conclusionsGiven the limited practical application of existing acceptance theories and our findings on contextual factors relevant to psychiatric diagnosis attitudes, the necessity of diagnosis acceptance as a stand-alone goal for positive outcomes should be questioned. Rather than imposing classifications, creating co-constructed narratives may be more effective. Researchers and clinicians are encouraged to adopt narrative approaches to better understand and support patients, thereby fostering reciprocal, patient-centred mental healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.