Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904117›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

The H-NS homologues MvaT and MvaU repress CRISPR-Cas in

Kira Céline Koonce, Jesper Juel Mauritzen, Ida Friberg Hitz, Emil Funk Vangsgaard, Elizabeth H M Putz, Anne Sofie Wajn, Frederik Hagelund Leth, Nina Molin Høyland-Kroghsbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The H-NS homologues MvaT and MvaU repress CRISPR-Cas inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Preface: the ecology and evolution of bacterial immune systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kira Céline Koonce *Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-8558
Jesper Juel Mauritzen *Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-914X
Ida Friberg HitzDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-2699-9858
Emil Funk VangsgaardDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Elizabeth H M PutzDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0008-1652-7604
Anne Sofie WajnDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Frederik Hagelund LethDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Nina Molin Høyland-KroghsboDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-8859

Funding

Danmarks Frie ForskningsfondLundbeck Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive immune system of bacteria and archaea that protects against foreign genetic elements. In

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA-Binding ProteinsPseudomonas aeruginosaTrans-ActivatorsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsMvaT protein, PseudomonasTrans-ActivatorsbacteriophageCRISPR-CasH-NSMvaTMvaUPseudomonas aeruginosaquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID40904117
PMCPMC12409366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.