ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Why do bacteria accumulate antiphage defence systems?
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shuttling, swapping, and mixing: the rapid modular evolution of antiviral repertoires in temperate phages and their satellites.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Cyclic tri-adenylate controls a CARF-TM effector in type II Panoptes anti-phage systems.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Preface: the ecology and evolution of bacterial immune systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While it is well established that bacterial genomes encode multiple and diverse antiphage systems, the reasons for their co-occurrence and their heterogeneous distribution remain debated. This review examines why bacteria accumulate antiphage systems and how this influences phage-bacteria interactions, particularly in the context of phage therapy. Two main hypotheses may explain this phenomenon: (i) the pan-immunity hypothesis, which suggests that defence system accumulation provides protection against phage predation at the community level, and (ii) mobile genetic element (MGE) competition, where defence systems primarily protect intra-bacterial MGEs against other ones rather than the bacterial host itself. The ecological context also influences the distribution of antiphage systems, with defencee accumulation shaping phage-bacteria interactions in diverse communities but playing a lesser role at the species level, potentially explaining why multiple defences do not strongly limit phage host range in therapeutic settings. Finally, we address the challenges in understanding the drivers shaping the distribution of defence systems across bacterial genomes (expressions, costs, etc.) and their implications for elucidating the ecological role of defence systems and optimizing phage therapy strategies.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'The ecology and evolution of bacterial immune systems'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.