ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Rician Likelihood Loss for Quantitative MRI With Self-Supervised Deep Learning.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Supervised Deep Learning Framework for Rician Distribution Based Denoising and Modeling of Multi-b Prostate Diffusion MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Implicit neural representations for accurate estimation of the Standard Model of white matter.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Rician Likelihood Loss for Quantitative MRI With Self-Supervised Deep Learning.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Implicit neural representations for accurate estimation of the standard model of white matter.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative MR imaging with self-supervised deep learning promises fast and robust parameter estimation without the need for training labels. However, previous studies have reported significant bias in self-supervised parameter estimates as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decreases. A possible source of this bias may be the choice of the mean squared error (MSE) loss function for network training, which is incompatible with MR magnitude signals. To address this, we introduce the Rician likelihood loss for self-supervised learning, which explicitly accounts for the distribution of MR magnitude signals during training. We develop a stable and accurate numerical approximation of the negative log Rician (NLR) likelihood loss and compare its performance against the MSE loss using the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model as an exemplar. Parameter estimation performance was evaluated in simulated data and real data in terms of accuracy, precision and overall error by quantifying the bias, standard deviation and root mean squared error of network predictions against ground truth (or gold standard) values over a range of SNRs. Results show that self-supervised networks trained with the NLR loss have increased accuracy (reduced bias) of IVIM diffusion coefficient at low SNR, at the cost of reduced precision. As SNR increases, the performance of the NLR and MSE losses converges, resulting in estimates with higher accuracy, higher precision and lower total error. The NLR loss has potential for broad application in quantitative MR imaging by enabling more accurate parameter estimation from noisy data. The NLR loss is available as a Python package: https://pypi.org/project/RicianLoss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.