ArticleNeural regeneration research2026
Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Immersive P300 Brain-Computer Interface Based on 3D Morphological Stimuli and Self-Adaptive Bayesian Linear Discriminant Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A systematic evaluation of EEG electrode geometry for enhanced signals: an experimental approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From technological closed-loop to human-machine trust: a systematic review of ethical and communication challenges of brain-computer interface in elderly care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI-powered detection of cyberbullying in short-form video content: A hybrid deep learning framework.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces have revolutionized the integration of neural signals with technological systems, offering transformative solutions across neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and clinical practice. This review systematically analyzes advancements in electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface architectures, emphasizing four pillars, namely signal acquisition, paradigm design, decoding algorithms, and diverse applications. The aim is to bridge the gap between technology and application and guide future research. In signal acquisition, noninvasive systems using wet, dry, and semi-dry electrodes are more comfortable and gentler on the skin compared to traditional methods. However, ensuring stable signal quality over long periods of time remains a challenge. Minimally invasive approaches, such as microneedle arrays and endovascular probes, achieve near-invasive signal fidelity without major surgery. Paradigm design explores task-specific neural encoders. Although motor imagery paradigms are widely used in rehabilitation, they require weeks of user training. Steady-state visually evoked potential and P300 speller paradigms enable rapid calibration, but cause visual and cognitive fatigue. Advanced systems currently combine electroencephalography with electromyography or eye-tracking to better handle real-world tasks. Decoding algorithms have advanced through Riemannian geometry for improved noise filtering, deep learning architectures for automated spatiotemporal feature extraction, and transfer learning frameworks to minimize cross-subject calibration. However, challenges remain in managing inconsistent electroencephalography, reducing processing demands, and ensuring compatibility across different electroencephalography devices. Clinical trials reveal a predominant focus on stroke rehabilitation, while emerging frontiers include astronaut neuro-monitoring in space exploration. Challenges include improving signal accuracy, minimizing movement interference, addressing ethical data concerns, and ensuring real-world use. Future advancements focus on biocompatible nanomaterials, adaptive algorithms, and multimodal integration, positioning electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces as pivotal tools in next-generation neurotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.