Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903928›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

A novel federated learning framework for medical imaging: Resource-efficient approach combining PCA with early stopping.

Negin Piran Nanekaran, Eranga Ukwatta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Negin Piran NanekaranDepartment of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Eranga UkwattaDepartment of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFederated learning (FL) facilitates collaborative model training across multiple institutions while preserving privacy by avoiding the sharing of raw data, a critical consideration in medical imaging applications. Despite its potential, FL faces challenges such as high-dimensional data, heterogeneity among datasets from different centers, and resource constraints, which limit its efficiency and effectiveness in healthcare settings. PURPOSE: This study aims to present a novel adaptive FL framework to address the challenges of data heterogeneity and resource constraints in medical imaging. The proposed framework is designed to optimize computational efficiency, enhance training processes, improve model performance, and ensure robustness against non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data across decentralized data sources.

methodsThe proposed adaptive FL framework addresses the challenges of high-dimensional data and heterogeneity in nonuniform and decentralized data sources through a key innovation. First, Federated incremental principal component analysis (FIPCA) achieves privacy-preserving dimensionality reduction by aggregating local scatter matrices and means from participating centers, enabling the computation of a global PCA model. This process ensures data alignment across centers, mitigates heterogeneity, and significantly reduces computational complexity. We evaluated the framework's ability to generalize across institutions in a cross-site classification task distinguishing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from non-csPCa. This assessment used 1500 T2-weighted (T2W) prostate MRI images from three institutions, where two centers (800 + 350 cases) were used for training and validation, and one center (350 cases) served as an independent test site.

resultsThe proposed method significantly reduced the number of global training rounds from 200 to 38, achieving a 98% reduction in energy consumption compared to the standard FedAvg algorithm. The effective use of FIPCA for dimensionality reduction enhanced generalizability, while adaptive early stopping prevented overfitting, leading to an improvement in model performance, with the area under the curve (AUC) on the unseen test center increasing from 0.68 to 0.73 (95 % CI 0.70 - 0.77) on the test center's data. Additionally, the method demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity, indicating superior classification performance. The integration of FIPCA accelerated convergence by reducing data dimensionality, while the adaptive early-stopping mechanism further optimized resource utilization and prevented overfitting.

conclusionsOur adaptive FL approach efficiently handles large, heterogeneous medical imaging data, reducing training time and computational overhead, while improving model accuracy. The substantial reduction in energy consumption and accelerated convergence make it suitable for real-world healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningPrincipal Component AnalysisFederated LearningHumansMaleProstatic Neoplasmsdata heterogeneitydata privacyfederated learningmedical image processingprincipal component analysisprostate cancer imaging

Identifiers

PMID40903928
PMCPMC12409104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.