Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903924›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025

Rehabilitation needs prior to adjuvant chemotherapy in a rural Swedish population.

Linn Norrgård, Bertil Axelsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linn NorrgårdResearch and Development Unit, Östersund Hospital, Östersund Hospital, Sweden; Department of Interventions and Diagnostics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. linn.norrgard@umu.se.
Bertil AxelssonDepartment of Interventions and Diagnostics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess well-being and unmet needs among participants, and examine differences between patients and their next of kin. SUBJECTS: Cancer patients pre-adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 231) in rural northern Sweden, and their next of kin (n = 204).

methodsWell-being and unmet needs were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Cancer Survivors' (Partners') Unmet Needs measure (CaSUN)/(CaSPUN). Descriptive methods summarized sociodemographic, cancer-specific, and psychosocial data. Non-parametric statistical tests examined the differences between patients and next of kin.

resultsThe HADS indicated that one-quarter of patients and one-third of next of kin possibly/probably had anxiety, and one-seventh of participants possibly/probably had depression. One-third of participants experienced no/minimal impact of cancer on well-being. The CaSUN identified unmet needs in all domains, but mostly in information and psychosocial domains. At least 15% of patients/next of kin reported unmet needs in 12/26 items. For most items, next of kin reported unmet needs at a similar/higher frequency than patients (10-25%).

conclusionThese findings underscore the importance of assessing well-being and rehabilitative needs in patients and their next of kin before chemotherapy, to identify those who may benefit from early professional support.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentNeoplasmsAdultAgedAnxietyChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSweden

Identifiers

PMID40903924
PMCPMC12416336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.