ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025
Social Listening as a Tool to Understand Nutrition-Related Information Needs: A Case Study in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informational needs in vulvar cancer and precursor conditions: a social listening study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Rethinking Restrictive Diets in IBD: Toward an Inclusion-Focused Nutritional Paradigm.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Social Listening as a Tool to Understand Nutrition-Related Information Needs: A Case Study in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory bowel disease is complex, heterogeneous and chronic, necessitating individualized and holistic long-term care and self-management. While dietary therapy can induce remission in some cases, no dietary guidelines currently exist for maintaining remission. Despite remission, gastrointestinal symptoms can persist. This, together with perceived lack of guidance from healthcare providers are sources of frustration. To bridge the dietary information gap, many individuals may turn to social media, where extensive discussions occur. This study aimed to quantify, explore and describe the nutrition-related information needs and experiences of this cohort by analysing comments on social media.
methodsThis study used social listening to examine online comments from select Facebook groups. Content and inductive thematic analysis were used to quantify, explore and describe deidentified comments. Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer aided content analysis. Topics of interest were represented as percentages.
resultsModerate agreement (75%) existed between manual and automated content analysis. Of the 11,945 comments, 37.5% were diet-related. Thematic analysis identified five interrelated themes: (1) desire for support and connection, (2) exasperation and desire for information, (3) open to considering advice from non-experts, (4) a desire for food to be thy medicine and (5) Inflammatory Bowel Disease holds me back.
conclusionFacebook groups provide access to information and connection, compensating for the perceived lack of timely and ongoing access to a knowledgeable and empathetic multidisciplinary care team. Dietitians caring for individuals with IBD should ensure the advice provided is practical and that barriers to implementation of advice are addressed to facilitate uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.