Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903822›Full record

ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies

Brain-Behavior Associations During Interactions Between Caregivers and Infants.

Aimee Theyer, Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Brain-Behavior Associations During Interactions Between Caregivers and Infants.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aimee TheyerSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sobanawartiny WijeakumarSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1008-3407

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RF-2023-378Leverhulme Trust RPG-2019-286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that infants' abilities to sustain attention are influenced by caregivers' attentional behaviors. Here, we inquired whether brain function in infants was linked to brain function in caregivers during attention periods in dyadic interactions, and whether this brain function was associated with visual short-term memory in infants. Caregivers (n = 90, mean age = 33.5 years) and infants (n = 91, mean age = 251.3 days) were recorded for 5- to 7-min as they naturalistically played with toys. During these interactions, brain function was recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). To assess visual short-term memory, infants were presented with a preferential looking task. Video recordings were coded for periods of joint attention between caregivers and infants, and periods of continued attention in infants. fNIRS data was processed to extract significant clusters of activation. Our findings revealed that temporo-parietal engagement in both caregivers and infants. Specifically, left superior temporal gyrus activation in caregivers during joint attention was linked to duration of joint attention, duration of continued attention, and visual short-term memory in infants. Our findings highlight cortical mechanisms engaged in caregivers and infants during dyadic interactions, and importantly, how these mechanisms are linked to visual short-term memory.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainCaregiversInfant BehaviorMemory, Short-TermAdultFemaleHumansInfantMaleSpectroscopy, Near-Infraredcaregiver‐infant interactionsfNIRStemporal cortexvisual short‐term memory

Identifiers

PMID40903822
PMCPMC12408883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.