ArticlePublic health nutrition2025
Evaluating the Nourish Network: a multi-sector collective initiative to progress healthy food retail in Australia.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the current state of the Nourish Network (NN) - a healthy food retail network, to inform future planning and improvement opportunities.
designA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews conducted between January and April 2024, open-ended survey questions from six online surveys applied between 2019 and 2022 and a focus group with the NN Advisory Committee (NNAC) in June 2024. Thematic analysis was applied to interview and survey data. Results from the thematic analysis were presented to the NNAC, which classified them according to the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats model, resulting in recommendations for future actions.
settingAustralia.
participantsNN members (interviews
resultsNine interviews yielded eight codes clustered into three themes: (i) NN performance, covering overall performance and management since 2018; (ii) members' engagement with NN activities, addressing current and future involvement and (iii) NN future directions for improvement. The NNAC highlighted strengths in membership diversity and credibility while noting weaknesses in mission clarity and participation. Opportunities for growth include becoming a resource hub through partnerships and national expansion, whereas threats involve limited resources. Recommendations emphasise clear operational tasks, policy alignment and measurement systems to boost accountability and engagement.
conclusionsTo effectively promote healthy food retail changes, the Network for Nutrition and similar organisations must establish a clear vision and enhance stakeholder engagement. This involves consolidating knowledge dissemination, fostering partnerships and securing funding. Ongoing efforts from collectives like the Nourish Network can facilitate research in resource-scarce areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.