Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903805›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health

Evidence-Based Suturing Education for Midwives.

Amanda Love Yeager, Cynthia Nypaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda Love YeagerUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0009-0006-5033-4297
Cynthia NypaverUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-1201-3311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perineal repair is a skill that student nurse-midwives must achieve competency in before graduating and entering practice. Students and new midwives often express a lack of confidence in their ability to undertake perineal repair. This article aims to share one public university nurse-midwifery program's experience developing and implementing a suturing education program with an interprofessional approach. We designed a workshop that optimized student confidence and competence in suturing by incorporating the best evidence. Components of this workshop included interprofessional education, leveraging of technology, online preparatory materials for students to reference and practice before attending, allowing time for in-person practice and return demonstration with instructor feedback, and evaluation of student competence at the end of the session. The lack of evidence for best practices in suturing education for student midwives highlights interprofessional suturing education-where midwives, medical students, and obstetric interns learn together-as a promising area for future research. Optimizing student competence through interprofessional education enhances new midwives' skills and confidence and fosters collaboration and trust among professions with shared clinical responsibilities, ultimately improving outcomes for providers and patients.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInterprofessional EducationMidwiferyNurse MidwivesPerineumSuture TechniquesFemaleHumansPregnancyStudents, Nursinginterprofessional educationmidwifery simulation trainingperineal repairsuturing education

Identifiers

PMID40903805
PMCPMC12716111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.