ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025
A study of the responsiveness of the Six-Spot Step Test in people with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the Six-Spot Step Test (SSST) in people with multiple sclerosis to assess its capability as a measure for detecting changes in gait and balance capacity following a 10-week training intervention.
methodsThe SSST, Timed 25-Foot Walk, and mini-BESTest were administered to 71 individuals with MS, ranging from mild to severe disability, before and after a 10-week program of progressive resistance and balance training. However, 16 patients were lost to follow-up. This study adhered to the COSMIN framework for reporting and evaluating the psychometric properties of health-related outcome measures.
resultsSpearman's analyses revealed a moderate negative correlation between changes in the SSST and the mini-BESTest (r
conclusionThe SSST serves as a sensitive measure for changes in gait and balance capacity. Furthermore, the consistently large effect sizes observed across all three gait and balance assessments following the exercise intervention suggest that these measures reflect a shared underlying construct-functional mobility-which is essential for independent community living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.