ArticleEmergency radiology2026
Afterhours diagnostic radiology in the USA: radiologists' views on imaging volumes, compensation, work-from-home, and compensatory time-off.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo understand the afterhours radiology workforce and views towards imaging volumes, compensation, overnight challenges, and work-from-home.
methodsSurvey questions focusing on the afterhours radiology workforce were created. The survey was administered by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the data analysis performed by the ACR in partnership with an independent market research agency. The confidence level was set at 95%, with an error rate of +/- 2.2%.
resultsA total of 1109 out of 1844 (60.1%) survey participants responded to the afterhours survey. A majority of respondents (56%) had worked an afterhours shift while a minority had worked a late-evening (18%) or overnight shift (13%). Irrespective of practice type, the majority of radiologists thought afterhours volumes were not manageable, and afterhours compensation was not equitable. Less than half of those who worked overnight shifts believed they were given adequate compensatory time-off for recovery. The majority of respondents supported work-from-home for afterhours shifts.
conclusionsAs the largest survey to date on after-hours radiology, these findings should be carefully considered by practices aiming to successfully recruit and retain radiologists in this critical niche.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40903648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.