ArticleNature2025
A prudent planetary limit for geologic carbon storage.
Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Poroelastic strain precursors during laboratory carbon dioxide core flooding revealed by helically bonded fiber sensing.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Carbon Removal Will Create Public Health, Economic, and Climate Trade-Offs.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Plentitude of Pathways: Expert Views on the Benefits and Risks of Carbon Dioxide Removal in Six Countries.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Salinity-Sediment Interactions Governing COACS omega · 2026Article
- Zoonoethics and Inclusive One Health Governance for H5N1 Panzootic: From Animal Culling to Co-responsibility.Public health ethics · 2026Article
- THMC Modeling for COACS omega · 2026Review
- CONature · 2026Article
- Design of a Magnesium Microstructured Biohybrid Material for Practical Atmospheric COACS applied energy materials · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geologically storing carbon is a key strategy for abating emissions from fossil fuels and durably removing carbon dioxide (CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.