Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903531›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025

Young anatomists perceptions of aorta-celiac trunk models and their use in anatomical education training.

Ozden Bedre Duygu, Figen Govsa, Serkan Oner, Nesibe Cabar, Zulal Oner, Tarkan Akderya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ozden Bedre DuyguDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.
Figen GovsaDepartment of Anatomy, Digital Imaging and 3D Modelling Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35100, Izmir, Turkey. figen.govsa@ege.edu.tr.
Serkan OnerDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.
Nesibe CabarDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.
Zulal OnerDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.
Tarkan AkderyaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomical variations of the aorta-celiac trunk are highly relevant in abdominal surgery and interventional radiology. Traditional CT-A images may fall short in conveying these complex structures. This study investigates whether patient-specific 3D models can enhance resident-level understanding of aorta-celiac trunk anatomy and support surgical education.

methodsIn this study, CT-A images of 1,000 adults aged between 18 and 60 were evaluated. Celiac trunk patterns were classified into eight types, and 3D solid models were created for each. In this study, seven residents were presented with eight stations, each showcasing an aorta-celiac trunk pattern in both CT-A and 1:1 scale solid model formats. The participants were asked to assess each format individually, identifying the variations, describing structural characteristics, and evaluating their educational value.

resultsThe vascular origin measurement values, when compared to the actual anatomical values of the corresponding cases, showed that the models were 1:1 identical replicas. According to the survey results, although 85.71% of the residents were aware of 3D printing and anatomical models, they lacked knowledge about the computer programs used to create these models. All residents agreed that the aorta-celiac trunk models enhanced their understanding of the vascular source and improved pattern recognition when compared to conventional cross-sectional CT-A imaging. Eight carousel-based stations provided qualitative assessments, with results showing the usefulness of celiac trunk models when used as anatomical tools for detecting pattern type (p = 0.018), determining the number of branches of the celiac trunk (p = 0.026), visualizing celiac trunk variations more clearly (p = 0.017), clearly observing the diameters of branches arising from the celiac trunk (p = 0.043), understanding the presence of variations in the celiac trunk (p = 0.018), and effectively explaining celiac trunk variations to residents (p = 0.018). Across all cases, participants' scores for understanding anatomical variations were significantly higher when using the 3D model; moreover, residents judged the 3D models to be substantially more useful than conventional twodimensional CTangiography slices for studying the celiac trunk.

conclusion3D aorta-celiac trunk models can improve anatomy education by offering tangible, high-fidelity representations that enhance visuospatial understanding. These models provide clear, demonstrative feedback, allowing learners to accurately grasp complex anatomical relationships. Specifically, the plastic-like material used to replicate celiac trunk vascular structures enables precise visualization of the origin, branching patterns, shapes, and angles-facilitating a well-structured and spatially coherent learning experience.

Indexed as

AnatomyAortaCeliac ArteryModels, AnatomicAdolescentAdultAnatomic VariationComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInternship and ResidencyMaleMiddle AgedPrinting, Three-DimensionalYoung Adult3D printing technologyAnatomic modelAnatomy trainingAorta-celiac trunk patternCarousel-based teaching tool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.