Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903469›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Global climate migration is a story of who and not just how many.

Hélène Benveniste, Peter Huybers, Jonathan Proctor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hélène BenvenisteSalata Institute for Climate and Sustainability, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. helene.benveniste@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1627-0219
Peter HuybersDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-8145
Jonathan ProctorFood and Resource Economics, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-8828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impact of climate change on human migration is critical for policymakers. Yet climate change can both incentivize people to migrate and reduce their ability to move, making its effect on human migration ambiguous. We propose an approach to studying migration that combines causal inference methods with cross-validation techniques to reliably estimate effects of weather on migration within and across borders. This approach highlights the key role of migrant demographics in the weather-migration relationship. We show that allowing weather effects to differ by age and education improves out-of-sample performance by a factor of five or more compared with a homogeneous effect. Demographic heterogeneity is critical in explaining this discrepancy. Projections based on our empirical estimates indicate that the effects of climate change on future cross-border migration will be an order of magnitude larger for most demographics than the average effect, but differing responses across groups largely offset one another.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEmigration and ImmigrationHuman MigrationAdultDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWeatherYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40903469
PMCPMC12408820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.