ReviewZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences2025
[Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a case series analysis of 10 patients and literature review].
Review in Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical data of 10 patients with pathologically confirmed primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PHNENs) were retrospectively analyzed. The cohort included 8 males and 2 females, with a median age of 63 years. None presented with carcinoid syndrome. Three cases were detected incidentally during health check-ups, 2 presented with painless jaundice, and 5 reported abdominal distension or pain (1 with concurrent jaundice). Elevated tumor markers included carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in 4 cases, alpha-fetoprotein in 2 cases, and neuron-specific enolase in 1 case. All patients underwent surgical resection, including hepatectomy and hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection, combining with resection and reconstruction of right hepatic artery, resection of liver metastases and pancreaticoduodenectomy according to the extent of tumor invasion.Preoperative imaging failed to diagnose neuroendocrine neoplasms in all cases. Final pathological diagnoses were neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G2 in 5 cases, NET G3 in 1 case, and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) in 4 cases. During the follow-up, 4 patients died and 6 survived. The study demonstrates that PHNENs lack specific clinical or imaging features, and the diagnosis relies on pathological examination after excluding metastatic disease. Radical resection remains the primary treatment, with prognosis varying significantly by tumor grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.