Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903428›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2025

Supportive Care Needs From Mid-to Long-Term Follow-Up Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Femke Jansen, Dominique Molenaar, Öykü Zarsat, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Robert P Takes, Remco de Bree, Johannes A Langendijk, Jose A Hardillo, Femke Lamers, C René Leemans and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Audit of Patient Communications Following Transoral Robotic Surgery.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Femke JansenCancer Center Amsterdam Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0111-0557
Dominique MolenaarCancer Center Amsterdam Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Öykü ZarsatDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Birgit I Lissenberg-WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Robert P TakesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johannes A LangendijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jose A HardilloDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Femke LamersDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C René LeemansCancer Center Amsterdam Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Irma M Verdonck-de LeeuwCancer Center Amsterdam Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 12820KWF Kankerbestrijding VU 2013-5930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited knowledge on the supportive care needs (SCNs) of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors during long-term survivorship.

aimsTo investigate SCNs from 2 to 5 years after treatment among HNC survivors, and its association with demographic, personal, clinical, physical, psychological, social and lifestyle, and cancer-related quality of life factors.

methodsSCNs were measured at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years using the supportive care needs survey (SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-HNC) in 403 HNC survivors. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to investigate changes in SCNs (continuous outcome) over time and factors associated with SCNs (continuous). Also, the proportion of unmet moderate-high SCNs (dichotomous) was calculated.

resultsSCNs on the health system, information and patient support and lifestyle domain decreased from 2 to 5 years, whereas physical and daily living, psychological, sexuality and HNC-function needs were stable. At 5 years, 33% of HNC survivors had unmet SCNs, in particular lack of energy/tiredness (9.2%) and dry mouth/sticky mucus (8.1%). Demographic (male, higher education), personal (personality, coping, self-efficacy), clinical (advanced tumor stage, tumor recurrence), physical (low handgrip strength), psychological (anxiety, depression, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR)), lifestyle (smoking, drinking, being underweight) and cancer-related factors (lower levels of functioning, lower levels of nausea and vomiting, higher levels of fatigue, constipation, financial, speech, social eating, dry mouth and sexuality problems, and painkiller usage) were associated with SCNs. Specifically FCR and painkillers usage were very consistently associated with higher SCNs.

conclusionsSCNs of HNC survivors decrease over time. A third experiences SCNs at long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Services Needs and DemandQuality of LifeSocial SupportAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaireshead and neck cancerhead and neck cancer functioning needshead and neck oncologyinformation needslifestyle needsneedsphysical and daily livingpsychological needssexuality needssupportive care needssurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40903428
PMCPMC12408419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.