ArticleHistopathology2025
Gastric biopsies with prominent eosinophils: Clinicopathologic features and response to therapy.
Article in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dupilumab versus placebo in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic gastritis (DEGAS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Trial
- Pediatric Eosinophil-Predominant Collagenous Gastritis: From Conventional Therapy to Dupilumab: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe use of the term 'histologic eosinophilic gastritis' (EoG) has been proposed for cases with ≥30 eosinophils/high power field (HPF) in five separate HPF and with no known associated causes of eosinophilia. This study evaluates the clinical presentation, pathologic characteristics of 'histologic eosinophilic gastritis'. METHODS AND
resultsGastric biopsies with prominent mucosal eosinophils over 23 years were retrieved yielding 87 qualifying cases. Clinical information and follow-up data were retrieved from medical records. Of the 72 cases with no discernible aetiology, 56 satisfied the criteria for 'histologic eosinophilic gastritis' (Group 1), while 16 had prominent eosinophils without satisfying these criteria (Group 2). There were no differences in clinical presentation, endoscopic findings, morphologic features or treatment response between these groups. The cases with a secondary aetiology (Group 3), included Crohn disease (n = 5), concurrent or prior history of Helicobacter pylori gastritis (n = 5), strongyloidiasis (n = 1), collagenous gastritis (n = 1), hyper-eosinophilic syndrome (n = 1), autoimmune atrophic gastritis (n = 1) and systemic mastocytosis (n = 1). Of the 10 patients with histologic eosinophilic gastritis who were treated with steroids (with or without a combination of other therapies), seven (70%) had documented response to steroid-based therapy, with three (30%) patients who were symptomatically steroid non-responsive. No histologic differences were identified in patients with steroid-responsive disease. Two patients developed relapsing disease characterized by severe abdominal pain dependent on steroid therapy.
conclusionsThe criteria for 'histologic eosinophilic gastritis' can miss cases with clinically significant eosinophilia and our study results argue against using this term for pathology diagnosis. The majority of patients with increased gastric mucosal eosinophils present with non-specific GI symptoms and endoscopic findings. While a significant proportion of patients improve symptomatically without treatment or with anti-acid therapy, a small proportion of patients develop steroid-dependent, relapsing idiopathic disease that warrants additional clinical follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.